baskets
08-29-2008, 10:56 PM
there is a growing sentiment here especially that "executive experience" (EE) is key in a presidential election. we all know barack obama has no EE, i will be the first to admit it. his running mate joe biden also has zero EE.
but i ask, does john mccain have EE? last time i checked, mccain has been a u.s. senator for 30 some years. i don't believe holding a senate seat qualifies as EE either. so obama, biden, and mccain all have zero EE.
and then there's sarah palin. does she really have "executive experience?" after all, she was a governor. but does that give her an edge up on obama, biden, and mccain in the EE arena? here's just one reason why i say no:
state governors are not diplomats; they DO NOT have foreign policy agendas. sarah palin has about as much foreign policy experience as i do.
let's stop pretending that running a state government is a microcosm of running a country. there are huge fundamental differences between the two. sure, being a governor provides valuable leadership opportunity. palin is a leader. but who's to say obama, biden, and mccain aren't also leaders? aren't congressmen and women leaders in our country? in fact, if we divide the state population in illinois by two (for two senators) obama represents about 6.5 million people to palin's 680K. so that argument is out the window.
you know what, i'm gonna throw this out there: currently, there are only 4 people in this country with executive experience to be president: jimmy carter, george h.w. bush, bill clinton, and george w. bush. hell, if its executive experience you guys want so much, maybe the republicans should have nominated george h.w. for another go around?
otherwise, let's end this "executive experience" bullcrap and stop pretending like either nominee or their running mates has an executive experience when it comes to running a country. they're all in the same frickin boat.
but i ask, does john mccain have EE? last time i checked, mccain has been a u.s. senator for 30 some years. i don't believe holding a senate seat qualifies as EE either. so obama, biden, and mccain all have zero EE.
and then there's sarah palin. does she really have "executive experience?" after all, she was a governor. but does that give her an edge up on obama, biden, and mccain in the EE arena? here's just one reason why i say no:
state governors are not diplomats; they DO NOT have foreign policy agendas. sarah palin has about as much foreign policy experience as i do.
let's stop pretending that running a state government is a microcosm of running a country. there are huge fundamental differences between the two. sure, being a governor provides valuable leadership opportunity. palin is a leader. but who's to say obama, biden, and mccain aren't also leaders? aren't congressmen and women leaders in our country? in fact, if we divide the state population in illinois by two (for two senators) obama represents about 6.5 million people to palin's 680K. so that argument is out the window.
you know what, i'm gonna throw this out there: currently, there are only 4 people in this country with executive experience to be president: jimmy carter, george h.w. bush, bill clinton, and george w. bush. hell, if its executive experience you guys want so much, maybe the republicans should have nominated george h.w. for another go around?
otherwise, let's end this "executive experience" bullcrap and stop pretending like either nominee or their running mates has an executive experience when it comes to running a country. they're all in the same frickin boat.