View Poll Results: Fitzpatrick is better than

Voters
133. You may not vote on this poll
  • Matt Cassell

    65 48.87%
  • Joe Flacco

    19 14.29%
  • Mark Sanchez

    77 57.89%
  • Matt Ryan

    4 3.01%
  • Jay Cutler

    35 26.32%
  • Matt Hasselbeck

    73 54.89%
  • Mike Vick

    9 6.77%
  • All These players are better than him

    25 18.80%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 49 of 49

Thread: Fitzpatrick is better than

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    Your momma?

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    2,426

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by D2k View Post
    you shouldve made this poll public so i could destroy whoever said that Fitz was better than Matt Ryan.
    I didn't say that he was better than Ryan, but Flacco on the other hand is one overrated QB. I just don't see fire in Flacco, I mean while surrounded by a weaker team Fitz almost beat him.

    I also said that Cassel(NE leftovers),Hasselbeck(because he is an old fart), and Sanchez (probably a homer pick, but it seems to me that he has all the talent around him and plays a very average game).

  3. #43
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    6,582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by D2k View Post
    I will not disagree with that at all. Yes i am old enough to remember all of them.

    But, that also doesnt speak very highly of what we have had around here. We must draft for that position for the future. I know as well as everyone else Fitz will be starting this year, but i am also a realist and our schedule this year doesnt present very many favorable matchups with Fitz at the helm.

    Nothing wrong with being the 1-2 best backups in this league, but sadly, IMo, thats all that he is.
    What's a favorable matchup- you mean like the Ravens and Steelers last year? Don't tell me those were Fitz's fault.

    Fitz is starting this year one way or another, and personally I'm not too upset about it. If they decided to go QB in the first round for the next few years, and utilize free agency to collect actual top-end talent, maybe I could see taking Gabbert in the first, but I just don't see pinning the next 4-6 years of this franchise on Gabbert or Newton- both these guys have way too many question marks.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    13,275

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by El Gato View Post
    What's a favorable matchup- you mean like the Ravens and Steelers last year? Don't tell me those were Fitz's fault.

    Fitz is starting this year one way or another, and personally I'm not too upset about it. If they decided to go QB in the first round for the next few years, and utilize free agency to collect actual top-end talent, maybe I could see taking Gabbert in the first, but I just don't see pinning the next 4-6 years of this franchise on Gabbert or Newton- both these guys have way too many question marks.
    Don't count on Nix getting anything but second tier players in FA.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    4,971

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by El Gato View Post
    What's a favorable matchup- you mean like the Ravens and Steelers last year? Don't tell me those were Fitz's fault.

    Fitz is starting this year one way or another, and personally I'm not too upset about it. If they decided to go QB in the first round for the next few years, and utilize free agency to collect actual top-end talent, maybe I could see taking Gabbert in the first, but I just don't see pinning the next 4-6 years of this franchise on Gabbert or Newton- both these guys have way too many question marks.
    So instead you will put this franchise in the hands of Fitz? You're telling me you are ok with that?

    Dude im really not gonna debate this, Fitz is awful.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    6,582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jm2009 View Post
    Don't count on Nix getting anything but second tier players in FA.
    You're probably right, and that's why I think they need to get the best players in the draft. Gabbert is nothing special, he just plays an important position.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    6,582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by D2k View Post
    So instead you will put this franchise in the hands of Fitz? You're telling me you are ok with that?

    Dude im really not gonna debate this, Fitz is awful.
    See, when you say Fitz is awful you completely discredit yourself- he's not awful, he's just not the best in the business. You really want to see this team waste another 4-6 years waiting around for a sub-average rookie prospect to 'get it'... he doesn't have 'it'.

    Btw, I didn't realize Roscoe is white.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Rockland County NY
    Posts
    3,410

    Default

    Hasselback(CREAKY OLD)- Cassell ( ON AND OFF) and Sanchez(WELL PROTECTED) and VICK!
    Sorry but lets wait and see what Vick does this year before anointing him as anything more than an 'ath-a-letic" QB!

    For some reason I still like crazy Cutler and think big things will happen in Chicago under him.

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Southern Maryland
    Posts
    6,668

    Default

    Matt Cassell, Mark Sanchez and Matt Hasselbeck (with an ailing back injury). Arm strength is the only reason I don't have him above Flacco.
    "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" - Jorge Santayana

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •