Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Cosell: The Wide Receiver Transformation

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    10,481

    Default Cosell: The Wide Receiver Transformation

    Now this in particular is interesting to consider, especially given the scheme we ran last year and that the quick short/mid game plays to Fitzy's strengths.

    Cosell: The Wide Receiver Transformation
    by Greg Cosell

    The spotlight in the upcoming NFL draft has been on quarterbacks, notably Andrew Luck and Robert Griffin III, with increased attention on Ryan Tannehill and Brock Osweiler. That’s understandable. It’s the most important position in the game.

    Here’s the follow-up question, one rarely scrutinized: In a passing league, how do we now evaluate the players on the receiving end of the quarterback’s throws?

    The transformation in the NFL game over the past decade has been widely documented. The expansion of three-wide receiver personnel has been the most visible change. I did not chart every snap this past season, but I believe, as I have said before, that a fair estimate would be 55-60 percent of the plays league-wide included three wide receivers. That’s been the clear trend over time.

    There’s more when you dig deeper. It’s not just the number of wide receivers, it’s how they are utilized — i.e. Where do they line up in the formation? What kind of routes do they run? In what areas of the field do they predominantly run those routes? This is where the concepts of receiver distribution and location are important. Distribution is the number of receivers on each side of the formation (for example, in a 3-by-1 set, there are three receivers to one side and one receiver to the other). Location specifically defines which positions those pass catchers actually play. You could have three receivers to the three-receiver side; or two wide receivers and a tight end; or a wide receiver, a tight end and a running back.

    With the increased emphasis on the passing game, and the resulting multiplicity in receiver distribution and location, it makes sense that the wide receiver position has undergone some dramatic changes, as well. When teams primarily lined up with two wide receivers (third-and-long being the exception), a certain set of attributes were needed, the most critical being the ability to win one-on-one isolation routes on the outside against quality corners. In addition, there was greater weight placed on vertical routes. Whether it was a function of speed or savvy route running, wide receivers at times needed to run past corners.

    This was the NFL’s conventional wisdom, which resisted change. Just think: Wes Welker did not get drafted. Marques Colston was a seventh-round pick. Their “value” as NFL players was marginalized because they did not fit the accepted gospel preached over decades. Both have been highly productive while playing almost exclusively in the slot, working between the numbers, a function of multiple-receiver personnel and creative use of distribution and location. Neither could line up on the outside consistently and win one-on-one matchups.

    Where would Welker and Colston be drafted in 2012? It’s a great question — one, of course, that is unanswerable. Yet its larger context will significantly impact some of the wide receivers on this year’s board. Let’s be clear: Wide receivers who can line up on the outside and win against man-to-man coverage at the short, intermediate and deeper levels (Andre Johnson and Calvin Johnson come to mind), always have more value. That’s inarguable.

    What about Alshon Jeffery of South Carolina? He will be a polarizing player for many teams. Given his measurements — 6-foot-3, 216 pounds — he fits the Colston profile. Jeffery’s best attributes are his size and his hands. He has very strong hands with a wide catching radius. He has shown the ability to make contested catches both at the intermediate and deeper levels. Jeffery is a great example of a wide receiver whose 40-yard-dash time is irrelevant. He’s not vertically explosive. At his best, he’s a long strider with some build-up speed. He will not tilt coverage (i.e. force a safety to play over the top) or dictate double teams. The question then becomes: How is he best utilized in the NFL? Can he line up outside and win? Is he ultimately a Colston-type inside receiver who can effectively use his big body to maximum advantage against nickel backs, linebackers and safeties? The answer to that question will determine where he is drafted.

    Another receiver who fits this conceptual template is Mohamed Sanu. Sanu is 6-1 1/2 and 211 pounds. He often played out of the slot at Rutgers, so he has meaningful experience in that role. He was outstanding between the numbers, consistently making difficult catches in traffic. Sanu’s 40 time is also not important to the evaluation process. He’s a short-to-intermediate route runner who relies more on working in confined areas where subtle moves and change of direction are at a premium. Sanu is a smoother, naturally quicker athlete than Jeffery. If the consensus is Jeffery cannot align outside and win, then Sanu is a more valuable and functional NFL prospect. At this point, Sanu is a more effective slot receiver.

    A big wide receiver who I believe can align on the outside and run the complete route tree is LSU’s Rueben Randle (6-3, 210). The more games I watch, the more I like Randle. He is smooth and athletic, with better acceleration off the ball than either Jeffery or Sanu. In some ways, he reminds me of the New York Giants’ Hakeem Nicks, who was not drafted until the 29th pick in the first round in 2009. Nicks was the fifth wide receiver selected that year (after Darrius Heyward-Bey, Michael Crabtree, Jeremy Maclin and Percy Harvin), but he’s clearly been the most productive of the bunch. Where Nicks has been very effective — and I project Randle playing a similar role — is at “x iso”, the single receiver to one side of the formation. When you’re aligned at “x,” you must be able to win versus man coverage.

    The larger point is this: With the increased emphasis on multiplicity of formations and personnel utilization, the framework for evaluating wide receivers has been amended — and expanded. We will see in a few weeks how that impacts where players like Randle, Sanu and Jeffery are chosen in the 2012 NFL Draft.
    justRN: "They carted off Freddies ACL after he ripped it out for being weak."

    Mark Asper: "He'd come smashing in there and make a big play and he has no emotion. He just goes back to the defensive huddle, and we had to trash talk for him. Our big line was 'Kiko Smash.' "#TheLegendOfKikoAlonzo



    www.billievers.com

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    728

    Default

    Good read!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Webster, NY
    Posts
    539

    Default

    The new nfl has been here a while...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    10,481

    Default

    If you think about the issues we likely will have with Hairston/rook at LT and Fitzy's strengths, it's likely that we continue to stretch the field horizontally rather than vertically. At least in the short-term, seems like a big, possession WR will be more valuable than a speedy deep threat.
    justRN: "They carted off Freddies ACL after he ripped it out for being weak."

    Mark Asper: "He'd come smashing in there and make a big play and he has no emotion. He just goes back to the defensive huddle, and we had to trash talk for him. Our big line was 'Kiko Smash.' "#TheLegendOfKikoAlonzo



    www.billievers.com

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kanatablues View Post
    If you think about the issues we likely will have with Hairston/rook at LT and Fitzy's strengths, it's likely that we continue to stretch the field horizontally rather than vertically. At least in the short-term, seems like a big, possession WR will be more valuable than a speedy deep threat.
    The Bills made it very obvious that they want and need a deep threat on the team when they brought in Meachem. No offense is going to succeed in the NFL with dink and dunk passes like we did last year. You have to have someone that keeps the safties back and we didn't do that last year so teams just pressed our receivers and blitzed the crap out of us.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    10,481

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FloridaGatorsBuffaloBills View Post
    The Bills made it very obvious that they want and need a deep threat on the team when they brought in Meachem. No offense is going to succeed in the NFL with dink and dunk passes like we did last year. You have to have someone that keeps the safties back and we didn't do that last year so teams just pressed our receivers and blitzed the crap out of us.
    Oh, I agree that it would be nice to have a threat that might keep DBs marginally honest - our lack of top end speed is a concern. But at this point, imho bpa at #10 is likely not an LT. We didn't re-sign Bell. We blew our budget on the DL, not that finding a decent/healthy LT in FA is easy to do anyways.

    So, if a 2nd/3rd rounder may not beat out Hairston for the starting LT job, and Hairston was at best adequate in pass protection, it may yet again be that we don't take many deep shots because of our OL. Anyways, the article makes some good points on how the use of WRs has changed, you can certainly argue that yards-after-catch may be more important than yards-per-attempt in today's game.
    justRN: "They carted off Freddies ACL after he ripped it out for being weak."

    Mark Asper: "He'd come smashing in there and make a big play and he has no emotion. He just goes back to the defensive huddle, and we had to trash talk for him. Our big line was 'Kiko Smash.' "#TheLegendOfKikoAlonzo



    www.billievers.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Newtown, CT
    Posts
    14,401

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FloridaGatorsBuffaloBills View Post
    The Bills made it very obvious that they want and need a deep threat on the team when they brought in Meachem. No offense is going to succeed in the NFL with dink and dunk passes like we did last year. You have to have someone that keeps the safties back and we didn't do that last year so teams just pressed our receivers and blitzed the crap out of us.
    The Pats made the Super Bowl doing just that...

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FloridaGatorsBuffaloBills View Post
    The Bills made it very obvious that they want and need a deep threat on the team when they brought in Meachem. No offense is going to succeed in the NFL with dink and dunk passes like we did last year. You have to have someone that keeps the safties back and we didn't do that last year so teams just pressed our receivers and blitzed the crap out of us.
    You also have to give the Qb a chance to look downfield to find his WR. Fitz needs a true LT! that will buy him time in the pocket and free the Rb to get open more ! Then yes another deep threat makes this an Offensive threat when on the field!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    8,706

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kanatablues View Post
    If you think about the issues we likely will have with Hairston/rook at LT and Fitzy's strengths, it's likely that we continue to stretch the field horizontally rather than vertically. At least in the short-term, seems like a big, possession WR will be more valuable than a speedy deep threat.
    This is true. However, the larger, less speedy receivers can still be "deep threats," some slow receivers get good separation deep, and some fast receivers get poor separation deep. I think the big, possession receiver who's "open when he's not" will also translate into that deep threat in one-on-one situations.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    16,689

    Default

    Rueben Randle in the 2nd!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •