If we pick a tackle in the first round, round two would you rather see the speed at receiver with Hill or the Speed at cornerback with Robinson?
If we pick a tackle in the first round, round two would you rather see the speed at receiver with Hill or the Speed at cornerback with Robinson?
Robinson.....
We WONT pick a tackle in the first. I will bet my life on it. First, there is no one worth the 10th pick unless Kalil is there. Second, Buddy has never ever drafted a tackle high, here or in SD.
I think we go OT in 2nd or third - same with WR - perhaps as late as the 4th. It is far more likely we take CB or Safety as the dropoff is greater after the top 20 picks. Other than Kalil, I think there are a bunch of OTs that are just as likely to work out as the others.
Looking forward to 2013:
Manuel - most upside in the draft
Woods - most pro ready WR
Alonso - tall ILB with coverage skills
Goodwin - fastest WR in draft
Duke Williams - prince of a pick
Meeks - no he is not
Hopkins - best K prospect in the draft
Gragg - vertical threat TE
Go ahead and complain - I am happy with this draft
Adopt a Bill - first choice Alonso, second Goodwin
If he has them graded as about the same, it depends on who the team likes more between Jones/Easley or Florence/McGee/McKelvin. If that were the case, I'd lean towards Hill.
2012 Adopt a Bill: Ron Brooks
In fairness to this dudes thread, the premise was "we pick a tackle first...".
Everyone surely knows how I feel about the LT position let alone the value of it in the later rounds, but that was not the premise.
If the Bills take an OT @10, do they then take Hill or Robinson?