
Originally Posted by
DIESEL-USMC
Relying on rookies at any position will be a ride of ups and downs. Its up to them to bring everything to a stable, high efficiency level. Even star players have days, but its the number of occurrences and the length of time between each one that sets players apart. Its not unorthodox to expect a rookie to do well. But it is unorthodox to expect them to start and maintain a high efficiency level of play their rookie season. Is it possible? Absolutely. But expect the growing pains to come at inopportune times during the season. May even cost a game or two.
This is true, but they will never really develop into starters if they don't get into the games. Now, maybe they're NOT starters from opening day, but I'd like to see them get some decent PT. I think the only position where that doesn't work is QB because you want the starter to get into a rhythm, but most positions use a lot of subs. Even with QBs, though, if you get a nice lead late, you should put your rookie QB in for a series or two to at least get rid of the butterflies.

Originally Posted by
pauliepaul
Sorry, but these guys don't HAVE to start. Hairston can, and may, start at LT. Same goes for McKelvin, McGee, Williams at CB. This article is jumping the gun. We don't know what to expect from the second year players.
This is true. The article was based upon Gilmore and Glenn lining up with the starters in the OTAs and minicamp, but that might very well have been just to see if they looked like they belonged with the starters. The Bills already have a good idea of what they have with A Williams and Hairston.
Buffalo Bills, 2000-????: same trailer, different park.
"Compassion is not weakness, and concern for the unfortunate is not socialism." -- Hubert Humphrey