Kelsay should be in during "running" situations. That's it.
And everytime Kelsay is on the field I would call a play action rollout to his side because he bites on it every time. Kelsay may be a good person but for football we can definitely do better.
"The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and conveniences, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy ". Martin Luther King
I've been a vocal critic of both Gailey and Kelsay, but I don't see this as such a big deal. Rotating players on the line is a reasonable and normal thing to do, it's just about finding the right balance. The staff also needs to be mindful of putting the right guys out there at the right time. If Kelsay reverts to form, Moore should get the lion's share of the reps.
The Chronicle of Shame
It started with a fiendish plan...
Then a 70-year-old rookie GM.
Criticism followed shortly.
Soon enough the truth to come to light...
Many were confused by this line of "logic".
His work done, Ralph settled in for another nice long rebuild.
Ladies and gents, your 2013 Buffalo Bills!*
*Note: Same as your 2001-2012 Buffalo Bills
LMAO, of course. Right means left to this organization. I'd have been shocked if they actually made the right decision and let Moore take the majority of snaps.
Gailey has to go, but it won't happen. too many foolish decisions by him.
Getting all fired up over something that hasn't happened yet? Can't you at least wait to see how it plays out?
Too often we . . . enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.
- John F. Kennedy
As long as Kelsay aint in there on passing downs I could careless. When Anderson comes back is when it will get tricky.
Last edited by jayryp80; 11-21-2012 at 06:03 PM.
what the hell is going on in here?