Before you die Lonestar, there is something you should know... I am your father's brother's nephew's cousin's former roomate.
I respect your opinion. I just don't happen to agree with it since I consider a leader more than what you have stated. A leader at the QB position takes command on the playing field, he makes that last minute drive count, he gets the ball to the right player and puts his team in position to win. The other attributes you mentioned are important as well. I see that in Luck and apparently so do the Colts. Lucks stats do not show a 6-4 team but the psychological aspect of having him At QB has helped them immensely.
I don't see that in Fitz. If this team gets on a roll then this could change.
Agree. No need to argue stats in Luck's case. Just go with the evidence of your eyes - the ocular proof. The kid is flat out fantastic. He is already in the top 10 of NFL QBs and probably on his way to being the best at some point in his career - and maybe sooner rather than later. Over the long haul at 6/4" 235 lbs and with his demonstrated ability at all phases of the QBs game, he was definitely the right pick at # 1 overall IMO.
Having said all that he definitely makes rookie mistakes as well as the mistakes that all QBs occasionally make, even the best of them.
I have the same questions as others concerning our predictable plain vanilla defensive schemes but we have played well three games in a row on that side of the ball. Fitz has not turned the ball over as much and Fred is good to go. We have a good shot at beating Indy.
Why do people get all worked up over a message board? We post opinions. Some are well founded, some are not, but good or bad, an opinion and a buck will get you a cup of coffee. For my two cents worth, Andrew Luck is a good rookie QB. He does lots of thigs well, but he makes rookie mistakes. There;s no reason to think he won't become at the very least a very good QB, and could become much better than that. It's clear that the Colts will be much tougher to beat than they would have been a year ago, but if the Bills play a strong, relatively error free game, there's no reason to think they can't beat the Colts. For much of the present season, it's the Bills who have been their own worst enemy.
My adopt-a-Bill is Marcel Dareus.
Do you have a reding comprehension problem. For the thrid time, I said I only watch ONE COMPLETE game from start to finish, I have seen him enough througout the season. ANd I don't consider watching multiple games simulatenously as watching ever play of the game.
ANd I didn't "rip" him, I said he is beatable AND strongly disagree with ESPNs rating him the 3rd best performing of a QB this year.
Other defenses make stops after turnovers, ours usually does not. The tired excuse is old because every team turns over the ball and their defense isnt tired. When we have 4 turnovers like the Jets game and the NE game, that is one thing. When you have 1 or two turnovers, thats something else.
A new year, a new hope, go Bills.
Im saying, you are right when we have like 4 turnovers a game. When you have 1 or 2 then "tired" is not an excuse. A defense should be able to come up with a big stop, just as much as a QB should be able to come up with a big drive. Im not up playing Fitz here. Im downplaying our defense. However, our defense atleast seems like they are getting better. Just as much as you would like to see Fitz go 2 games in a row with no turnovers, I would like to see our defense play 2 full games in a row and not just a miraculous 2 stops, in the second half after allowing 4 straight scoring drives.