Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 61 to 79 of 79

Thread: Knowing what we know right now..would you rather be 5-11 or 9-7?

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    6,127

    Default

    I'll take wins over higher draft picks any day. You don't build a winning culture by losing. If this team can consistently go 9-7 every year, we'll be in the playoffs eventually. The NYG were 9-7 the first year they won it.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    LaLaLand
    Posts
    9,107

    Default

    ....how refreshing it would be to have a winning season at 9-7 even if we do land 1 game out of the playoffs....I think this team realizes how much talent they have and that they hugely underachieved in the 1st half.....if we had won even 2 of the Jets, NE, Titans, Colts games I think we would've had the 10 win season so many predicted....I still have serious concerns about Gailey, Wannstedt & Fitz???
    "The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and conveniences, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy ". Martin Luther King

  3. #63
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Odessa, FL
    Posts
    3,378

    Default

    Definitely 9-7. Losing breeds losing whereas winning out will carry forward to next year, especially with the young guys we have.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    7,511

    Default

    This thread has brought out an extraordinary number of narrow-minded nut jobs. There's this thing called "losing the battle & winning the war." I don't care about draft position, but i'm far beyond the point of believing in chan & fitz. If we're already not making the playoffs & 5-11 is what it takes to get change around here, so be it. Seriously, how many games have we won because chan outcoached the opposition? Zero?

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Niagara Falls Ont.
    Posts
    3,620

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cspinner View Post
    9-7 ... boost morale... help attract more free agents
    Yup^^ This^.

    Those FA's might be swayed by billiieving we are one player from winning...him,whom ever he may be.
    Section 222 Row 5 seats 1,2

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    10,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Buffalo86 View Post
    There's this thing called "losing the battle & winning the war."
    There's also this thing called "winning the battle & winning the war"

    See what I did there?


  7. #67

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Buffalo86 View Post
    This thread has brought out an extraordinary number of narrow-minded nut jobs. There's this thing called "losing the battle & winning the war." I don't care about draft position, but i'm far beyond the point of believing in chan & fitz. If we're already not making the playoffs & 5-11 is what it takes to get change around here, so be it. Seriously, how many games have we won because chan outcoached the opposition? Zero?
    Again, how do you know change happens at 5-11? I dont know it will, and neither do you.

    What I would like to see is: What do the oddsmakers have the Bills going 9-7 at, and what are the odds they go 5-11. Show them together, because my guess, and its only a guess, is that the odds right now are about the same, or maybe even in the favor of winning, because 3 of the 4 remaining games are "home" games.
    2013 Adopt a Bill---Chris Hairston



  8. #68
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    7,511

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AZbacker View Post
    There's also this thing called "winning the battle & winning the war"

    See what I did there?
    Not really.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    7,511

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vegasloveforthebills View Post
    Again, how do you know change happens at 5-11? I dont know it will, and neither do you.

    What I would like to see is: What do the oddsmakers have the Bills going 9-7 at, and what are the odds they go 5-11. Show them together, because my guess, and its only a guess, is that the odds right now are about the same, or maybe even in the favor of winning, because 3 of the 4 remaining games are "home" games.
    Um, when did i say that i was sure that 5-11 would get chan fired? That didn't happen. Do you really think that going 5-11 instead of 9-7 doesn't increase the chances?

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    4,476

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vegasloveforthebills View Post
    To me 9-7. To have the first winning season in 8 years, lifting at least that "curse" is something.
    Exactly. I haven't even read further than this response b/c it's all that needs to be said. The draft will be the draft. I'm tired of worrying about the draft. Let's get a winning record for once. At least that way we have something to build on for next year. A 9-7 record at this point would be a very nice finish and we'd go into the off season with momentum. As silly as that sounds it's not a bad thing. I'm sure they'd come out much stronger next season knowing that they went down swinging. Not many teams will get to finish their season on a Win. All but one playoff team will finish on a Win. Then a couple of the non playoff teams may get out of the season on a Win. I'd like to go 9-7 regardless of what happens with the playoffs.
    Adopt a Bill 2012: Ron Brooks is going to be a beast! Write that ish down!

    If you don't bleed red white and blue then get out of the house cause you're not part of the family.

  11. #71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Buffalo86 View Post
    Um, when did i say that i was sure that 5-11 would get chan fired? That didn't happen. Do you really think that going 5-11 instead of 9-7 doesn't increase the chances?
    You said 5-11 is what it takes to get change. If I misinterpreted, I apologize.

    Just to my point though. I saw the odds of the BIlls getting to 9-7 and making the playoffs at 24.7%. Listening to Buddys speak last week, I would put the odds of them losing 4 and firing Chan/Fitz at lower than 24.7%.

    So I am saying, if neither playoffs or chan/fitz being forced out are going to happen, why would you then want to lose to fall to 5-11.
    2013 Adopt a Bill---Chris Hairston



  12. #72
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    7,511

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vegasloveforthebills View Post
    You said 5-11 is what it takes to get change. If I misinterpreted, I apologize.

    Just to my point though. I saw the odds of the BIlls getting to 9-7 and making the playoffs at 24.7%. Listening to Buddys speak last week, I would put the odds of them losing 4 and firing Chan/Fitz at lower than 24.7%.

    So I am saying, if neither playoffs or chan/fitz being forced out are going to happen, why would you then want to
    lose to fall to 5-11.
    I said "IF going 5-11 is what it takes..."
    You take that word out & it's a totally different meaning. I think the odds of us making the playoffs at 9-7 are pretty slim. I also think that if we made the playoffs, it would be in spite of gailey & not because of him. There's a lot of talent on this team & it's being wasted, imo.

  13. #73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Buffalo86 View Post
    I said "IF going 5-11 is what it takes..."
    You take that word out & it's a totally different meaning. I think the odds of us making the playoffs at 9-7 are pretty slim. I also think that if we made the playoffs, it would be in spite of gailey & not because of him. There's a lot of talent on this team & it's being wasted, imo.
    Agreed, thats why I will admitt I misunderstood.

    I agree, playoffs are slim. But the way I look at it, if the odds are the same as playoffs or firing, I will root for the slim chance at playoffs, than the same odds of a firing.
    Last edited by vegasloveforthebills; 12-07-2012 at 05:37 PM.
    2013 Adopt a Bill---Chris Hairston



  14. #74
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    upstate ny
    Posts
    1,596

    Default

    9-7 for sure, that means we'd have a winning season and possible play-offs, guys would be playing well and have more confidence going into next year regardless. I think it would be a springboard cause half of our problem is getting down when we get behind and expecting to lose. Once that mental wall is broken down and the players expect to win it makes a big difference.
    “In retrospect, there would be little motivation even for malevolent extraterrestrials to attack the Earth; perhaps, after a preliminary survey, they might decide it is more expedient just to be patient for a little while and wait for us to self-destruct.”
    ― Carl Sagan

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2,325

    Default

    9-7 all day

  16. #76
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    11,021

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by garrickcc View Post
    LOL typical response from you...




    Interesting...........who are you and why would i possibly care.
    Can you dig it.

  17. #77
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,514

    Default

    Easily 9-7. More momentum, better morale, an actual winning season, and let's be honest - if we lose out to the final four teams on our schedule, we have some HUGE issues.
    Buffalo Crossing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ibhappy View Post
    On the final point, so what. If brains, were so important, why does the Ivy League produce so few NFL quarterbacks?

  18. #78
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    445

    Default

    From 4-12, 6-10, 9-7, showing a two game improvement 2013 11-5, playoffs!

  19. #79
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    260

    Default

    Co-sign

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •