Obviously you would have to restructure Fitzs deal, but with how often Vick gets hurt Id like Fitz as insurance. Im not saying its going to happen but if it did how would you feel?
Obviously you would have to restructure Fitzs deal, but with how often Vick gets hurt Id like Fitz as insurance. Im not saying its going to happen but if it did how would you feel?
No and no.
I am not a number, I am a free robot.
Read my blog of way-out-there movie reviews... and die:
http://farreachingfilms.blogspot.com/
Come get a clue before you post ridiculousness
I am not a number, I am a free robot.
Read my blog of way-out-there movie reviews... and die:
http://farreachingfilms.blogspot.com/
Vick a few years ago-sure. Now-nope.
Originally Posted by HiddenInLight
Then what would we do about our lack of CBs LTs WRs and LBs with no 1sts for the next 4 years and no seconds for the next 3? This team would be SO much worse off if we made that deal. Washington will not make the playoffs in the next 5 years. You can sig that.
I'm as anti-Fitz as they come, that being said I want no part of this scenario at ALL.
Vick has the toughness and durability of a piece of balsa wood not just that he has made some horrible decisions this year as well.
Welcome to Buffalo EJ Manuel!
I'm okay with anything that has "Fitz as a backup" in it
Best Fans in the NFL
Noooooooooooooo
“In retrospect, there would be little motivation even for malevolent extraterrestrials to attack the Earth; perhaps, after a preliminary survey, they might decide it is more expedient just to be patient for a little while and wait for us to self-destruct.”
― Carl Sagan
i dont care who starts at QB as long as its not someone already on the roster
go bills
go sabres
go knicks
go sox
steve johnson is our future star
Fred jackson is my adopted player this year!!
freddie freddie!!
Are people more against having Vick here, or having Fitz as a backup? I can understand not wanting Vick, sure. But if you're against Fitz being a backup, then you're being irrational.
Jesus why can't we just start over on QB? If Washington can pull in RG3 and Kirk Cousins, and Seattle can pull in Russell Wilson and Matt Flynn, then why do we have to retread on 30 year old backups?
Originally Posted by HiddenInLight
Then what would we do about our lack of CBs LTs WRs and LBs with no 1sts for the next 4 years and no seconds for the next 3? This team would be SO much worse off if we made that deal. Washington will not make the playoffs in the next 5 years. You can sig that.
Vick has NEVER been a viable long term option for anyone...there is a reason Atlanta went from average to good after Vick and not with. And as far as Fitz goes, I dont want him anywhere near this team
I doubt it'd ever happen. Don't want it to happen. Vick is going to be 33 years old, Has taken beating after beating and hardly plays a full 16 game schedule. Time for the Bills to get serious about drafting a franchise QB. Tired of the lame duck QB's here.
''You appease (fans) for about three months,'' Nix said. ~ 11/2/2012
Chan Gailey 12/26/2010 - Pass rush would of helped a couple of those. That guy (Tom Brady) stood back there forever and someone finally come open.
a dog beater and a con man, perfect fit !
"lets end this playoff drought"
I think Vick can still get it done. He just needs a run first offense.
13 years of no playoffs and a roster ready to win now and people want to start over with a Rookie QB in the worst QB draft class in 10 years...wonder why we are a laughingstock. Il take Vick any day and you guys can have some 4th round value QB that we force 10th overall.
we can barely get Ralph to pay one starters salary never mind two
I love the smell of charcoal in the morning.