Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 46 of 46

Thread: DRAFT ORDER: Chiefs, Jax, Oakland, Eagles, Detroit, Browns and at #7 Buffalo Bills.

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jnagy View Post
    I do like Gleenon. I would not mind us taking another position with the first pick,and trading back into the first if it worked out that way. But there is no guarantee we find a trade partner or "our guy" will still be on the board. This is the year that go get your QB. They can not afford to wait for him and hope he will be there. By the way I dont think Gabbert or Locker would have been picked by any other team until the late first If Jax/Tenn did not take them. But then again you never know what other teams are going to do... that's the point.
    That's a good point. There are a bunch of teams that will go for a QB. And I suppose I'd rather take Glennon high (combine and workouts pending) then have to take a Wilson or Dysert in the 2nd. My theory is the best of both worlds which is probably pretty unlikely. We just have to be 100% sure Glennon is a franchise guy.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    charlotte,NC
    Posts
    1,422

    Default

    RD1. Geno Smith/Mike Gleenon/Ryan Nassib/Tyler Wilson

    RD2. Kiko Alonso LB/Aaron Dobson WR

    RD3. Marcus Davis WR/Nick Clancy LB

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,935

    Default

    T'eo wont be there when we pick, even if it's at #6.
    BILLS FAN SINCE '85

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    18,242

    Default

    Take your Qb in round 1, no more messing around.
    What would you be doing if nothing were impossible...

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2,342

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Astb41 View Post
    I agree with you. However, again drafting a QB high doesn't make him a franchise QB. If you can take defense at #7 and trade back into round 1 to get Glennon don't you prefer that? With Smith being the insurance policy. If you go through camp and the rookie wins the job then fine he's the starter. But smith gives you the option to have a reliable veteran presence that can win as many or probably more then the rookie. This team has proven that they can't win with inconsistency at QB. A rookie that is learning the ropes may be too much for the rest of the team to handle. Carson Palmer sat his rookie year behind Jon Kitna and he was the #1 overall pick!! Without that shoulder injury in the playoffs against the steelers his career may be in a very different position then it is now. I want to win now. And while I'd hope a rookie QB could provide that we have to be smart and not set the team back 5 more years just so we can say we drafted a QB in the top 10.

    Your telling me Blaine Gabbert is a "franchise" QB?? We are in the same position the Jags were 2 years ago and they are already looking for a new QB. I'm not saying don't daft one, just be smart about it. The whole team needs help! We can't miss this pick!
    I disagree .. you just keep picking Qbs until you get one that works and then keep picking until you have 2 that work
    The sun is the same in a relative way but you're older,
    Shorter of breath and one day closer to death.
    --- Pink Floyd

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eregitano View Post
    Take your Qb in round 1, no more messing around.
    I'd generally agree- don't mess around and grab your QB. Enough is enough.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •