Originally Posted by HiddenInLight
Then what would we do about our lack of CBs LTs WRs and LBs with no 1sts for the next 4 years and no seconds for the next 3? This team would be SO much worse off if we made that deal. Washington will not make the playoffs in the next 5 years. You can sig that.
Every analyst is saying there are NO QB's in the top 30 that are BPA !!!! It's not just my opinion. You can't draft a QB every year and think he should make it or break it after one year. You have ti invest at least 3 years to evaluate. This is not the year to REACH for a QB at #8. Why can't you accept that ????
"I personally agree with Mayock. I've said this all year. I can guarantee that there will be a run on qb's in the first. This class is better than most think. They just have the bad "luck" of following last year's crop". I think the only qb's that will be considered at 8 are Smith, Barkley, Wilson, and (maybe) Glennon. quoted by whorlnuts....1/22/13
Levi Brown fulfilled our 5 year quota. I'm surprised he managed to eke through as BPA in the 7th of that draft.
Some day, Fitz will retire and we'll need to cross our fingers that another Levi Brown will fall in our laps.
"I personally agree with Mayock. I've said this all year. I can guarantee that there will be a run on qb's in the first. This class is better than most think. They just have the bad "luck" of following last year's crop". I think the only qb's that will be considered at 8 are Smith, Barkley, Wilson, and (maybe) Glennon. quoted by whorlnuts....1/22/13
"The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and conveniences, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy ". Martin Luther King
we've drafted 2 QBs in the first round in the last 30 years. Time to get one this year. BPA has worked out so well for us. Time to get the position we need an improvement in the most-QB. Barkley would be a nice pick. Why can't you accept that the Fitz is not, and never will be the answer?
Originally Posted by HiddenInLight
Then what would we do about our lack of CBs LTs WRs and LBs with no 1sts for the next 4 years and no seconds for the next 3? This team would be SO much worse off if we made that deal. Washington will not make the playoffs in the next 5 years. You can sig that.
We can get a QB in round 2 that's just as good as the QB we could pick 8th overall.
Give me Corderelle Patterson in round 1 and Mike Glennon in round 2 and I'll be pretty happy. Graham and Patterson on the outside will get Stevie matched up in single coverage all day in the slot because the safeties will have to worry about the deep ball so much.
Honestly, the lazy thing caught me a bit off guard...I really didn't see it coming, but I probably should have when he got in trouble for taking illegal gifts. I just thought he was average, physically, and maxed out potential wise. He is still young though, so hopefully they whip him into shape and he plays to his potential...he probably wont be a star, but he can still be good. To your point, he does show flashes, but most decent players in the NFL can do that...what seperates the good ones is the consistency with which they do it.
As for his role in this new defense...Hard to say, because I am not 100% sure what they are going to run, so anything I say now would be completely speculative. If I based it on what Baltimore and the Jets do, He'll be two gapping on run downs and (if he stays on the field) trying to get upfield in pass rush situations. Ideally a poor man's Ngata or Wilkerson, worst case a space eater more like a pouha.
The good news is, Carrington looks to be much improved and might be the disruptor from the inside they thought they were getting with Dareus. Dareus - K. Williams - Carrington could be formidible. M. Williams - Sheppard - Bradham and another OLB is a pretty good front 7. But chances are they drop a lineman on most spread/passing situations and replace him with a CB....drop the SS down into the box if they are getting run on or to blitz.
Last edited by mikey152; 02-21-2013 at 01:38 PM.
"I personally agree with Mayock. I've said this all year. I can guarantee that there will be a run on qb's in the first. This class is better than most think. They just have the bad "luck" of following last year's crop". I think the only qb's that will be considered at 8 are Smith, Barkley, Wilson, and (maybe) Glennon. quoted by whorlnuts....1/22/13
Originally Posted by HiddenInLight
Then what would we do about our lack of CBs LTs WRs and LBs with no 1sts for the next 4 years and no seconds for the next 3? This team would be SO much worse off if we made that deal. Washington will not make the playoffs in the next 5 years. You can sig that.
Originally Posted by HiddenInLight
Then what would we do about our lack of CBs LTs WRs and LBs with no 1sts for the next 4 years and no seconds for the next 3? This team would be SO much worse off if we made that deal. Washington will not make the playoffs in the next 5 years. You can sig that.
Bills FO office thought he was good enough to give him a big contract when he was playing well. Where were you and whorlnuts when that went down ???? I'll wager you both were applauding just like the rest of us. Face it...there won't be a QB picked at #8 this year. Sorry......
"I personally agree with Mayock. I've said this all year. I can guarantee that there will be a run on qb's in the first. This class is better than most think. They just have the bad "luck" of following last year's crop". I think the only qb's that will be considered at 8 are Smith, Barkley, Wilson, and (maybe) Glennon. quoted by whorlnuts....1/22/13
You two are correct I believe. There is no Andrew Luck or RGIII this year that are going to go 1 & 2.
Buddy has proven that he isn't going to reach for someone that isn't "proven" - i.e. one year wonder, has injury/character concerns, isn't a 3 or 4 year starter, etc.